Is the mass media multiple independent sources of journalism, or just one voice pretending to offer varying objective perspectives? Q561 is our clue.
“A lie told once remains a lie
but a lie told a thousand times
becomes the truth”
— Joseph Goebbels
In the last few days we have had a string of hit pieces on #QAnon published by the mass media. These include:
- What Happens When QAnon Seeps From the Web to the Offline World — New York Times (plus 8 tweets on the subject)
- ‘QAnon’s’ conspiracy theory creeps into mainstream politics — Associated Press (and widely syndicated to outlets like Yahoo and PBS).
- Psychiatrist struck off for posting ‘bizarre’ QAnon conspiracy theories — The Guardian
For a “debunked”, “baseless”, and “sprawling” belief — that people in power might not have your best interest in mind — that’s a lot of coverage. Indeed, QAnon adherents remarkably manage to be simultaneously “fringe” and
“mainstream”. Quite a feat!
If QAnon was a deranged cult-like doctrine, divorced from objective reality, then you might expect to find a significant number of ex-believers, help groups, and uplifting compassionate stories of rescue and recovery in the press. Their absence tells you something.
As always, none of these articles asks the obvious question: who is pushing these Q drops, and with what agenda? The failure to do basic journalism ought to be ringing alarm bells for even the most hardened skeptic. Something is not right here!
Instead of even-handed investigation and diligent search for truth, we instead get a torrent of slurs, diversions, and outright lies. For an example of deceit, Dave Hayes (who tweets as Praying Medic) did a Freedom Of Information Act request to the FBI to fact-check the New York Times.
It ought to be a scandal that the New York Times would suggest dissent from their preferred narrative makes you a potential terrorist. So why would these media companies put out these flimsy hit pieces that open them up to future scorn and collapsed credibility?
One answer can be found in Q drop number 561 from January 2018.
It alleges that these media companies are effectively just paid contractors in a propaganda operation on behalf of a criminal shadow government. The “pack journalists” are all working from the same talking points, sent at 4am each day to private email addresses.
This should not be a great surprise: the Church Commission exposed the Mockingbird Media, and Obama legalised it by abolishing the Smith-Mundt act. The media industry is highly concentrated, and overwhelmingly allied to one narrative.
If the allegation of Q561 is true, then these mediacos are criminal organisations, even if many working for them may be innocent and honourable. Even if they wanted to, they cannot report honestly on QAnon because it exposes their employer’s own crimes to examination by the masses. This is not a difficult logic problem to unpick!
With the Russiagate failure, Spygate/FISAgate scandal, and collapse of the impeachment hoax, it won’t be long until the role of the media is under intense scrutiny. Sedition, racketeering, and advocating the overthrow of the government all come with severe penalties. This is not a game!
To really concentrate your mind on whether you are on the right side of history, I’d like you to consider this quote from the AP article on QAnon:
Pizzagate and other far-right conspiracy theories have faded, but experts see no end in sight to QAnon’s popularity.
The Department of Justice recently published the following (highlighted in Q3845):
It’s not news to many of us that paedosadists use codewords to communicate. Now I would like to offer you the following. I am warning you in advance this is going to be a “wake up!” slap in the face, and to stop reading if you’re feeling sensitive about it.
Ready?
Why Is Child Rape Called Pizza? It is called thus because when the child rapist sodomizes the infant or child, the mix of blood and semen from a torn rectum looks like a tomato and mozzarella pizza topping. Look how Hollywood openly mocks the subject in the video above.
As Q tells us over and over, “these people are sick!”. Almost unbelievably, this is the milder end of the evil that has been uncovered.
These media companies are credibly alleged to be covering up serious organised crime and extremely violent acts against children. Are you really sure these organisations are innocent of these charges? Your conscience will sting if you make a mistake!
I would hate to have to explain my laxity to my own children down the road, if I had made the wrong call. Holding that in mind, this may be a good time to reflect:
- Have you done your homework on this subject thoroughly?
- How much of your worldview comes from these corrupt media companies?
- Is there sufficient evidence and motive at this point for you to take a pause to reconsider whether you are on the right side of history?
What happens when people learn the TRUTH?
What happens when people WAKE UP?
They will not be able to walk down the street.
THE GREAT AWAKENING.
Q
Read It Now
